Assimilative and Contrastive Emotional Reactions to Upward and Downward Social Comparisons
نویسندگان
چکیده
Henry Fleming, the central character of Stephen Crane's (1952/1895) Civil War novel, The Red Badge of Courage, eagerly joins the Union army although he knows little about war. Only much later does he realize how ignorant he is about whether he will run when the fighting starts. This uncertainty about himself sets off a disguised but full-scale search for social comparisons until, through the gut check of battle, he can " . . . watch his legs discover their merits and their faults" (Crane, 1952/1895, p. 21). Much of the classic and current social comparison theory would find support in how Fleming uses social comparisons during the several days portrayed in the novel (Suls & Miller, 1977; Suls & Wills, 1991). Festinger (1954) emphasized the role of uncertainty in motivating a person's interest in social comparisons, and it is Fleming's ignorance about his own capacity for bravery that first prompts him to probe for fears among the other soldiers so as " ... to measure himself by his comrades" (Crane, 1952/1895, p. 21). Even the seemingly objective test of battle is confounded by social comparisons. In an early battle, Fleming panics and runs, but it is the sight of other soldiers turning tail first that induces his behavior, creating in social comparison terms a form of social validation (Cialdini, 1993) that spurs him to " ... speed toward the rear in great leaps" (Crane, 1952/1895, p. 47). Perhaps the novel's most striking use of social comparisons, however, is the degree to which the many swings in Fleming's emotions seem determined by how he compares himself with other soldiers. Although he fears that his running from battle proves he is a coward, Fleming can occasionally find brief emotional comfort in noticing that many others ran, often with even greater zeal. He sees a roadway cluttered with fearful, retreating troops, and these downward comparisons produce pleasure rather than pity (e.g., Wills, 1981). But, just as frequently, upward comparisons intrude, creating unpleasant feelings (e.g., Brickman & Bulman, 1977; Salovey & Rodin, 1984). He sees an advancing group of infantry looking proud
منابع مشابه
Status and solidarity in social comparison: agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions.
Social comparison involves positioning the self relative to others on a vertical or status dimension (ranging from upward to downward comparisons) and a horizontal or solidarity dimension (ranging from contrastive to connective comparisons). Across 3 studies in which 389 undergraduates recorded everyday social comparisons (n = 4,417), downward and connective comparisons were rated as more helpf...
متن کاملPERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Markman, Tetlock / ACCOUNTABILITY AND COUNTERFACTUALS Accountability and Close-Call Counterfactuals: The Loser Who Nearly Won and the Winner Who Nearly Lost
This article links recent work on assimilative and contrastive counterfactual thinking with research on the impact of accountability on judgment and choice. Relative to participants who felt accountable solely for bottom-line performance outcomes, participants who were accountable for their decision-making process (a) had more pronounced differential reactions to clearly winning versus (winning...
متن کاملFor better and for worse: everyday social comparisons between romantic partners.
The authors examined the frequency, direction, and impact of social comparisons between romantic partners. Comparisons were expected to occur on a daily basis, owing to regular interactions between partners. To the extent that one empathizes and shares outcomes with one's partner, one might respond more positively to upward than to downward comparisons. Study 1a was an experience-sampling study...
متن کاملThe ups and downs of social comparison: mechanisms of assimilation and contrast.
Social comparisons influence self-evaluations in multiple ways. Sometimes self-evaluations are assimilated toward a given standard. At other times, they are contrasted away from the standard. On the basis of the selective accessibility model (T. Mussweiler, 2003a), the authors hypothesized that assimilation results if judges engage in the comparison process of similarity testing and selectively...
متن کاملClarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): an integrative study.
It has been speculated that the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE; the negative impact of highly selective academic settings on academic self-concept) is a consequence of invidious social comparisons experienced in higher ability schools. However, the direct role of such comparisons for the BFLPE has not heretofore been documented. The present study comprises the first evidence that the BFLPE ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008